About Me

Name: GLASSER
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

460,000 'American' Muslims support suicide bombers

Finally, I can write in this box. It has been 2 weeks. I have written a post in the comment section already< and won"t repeat it here
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Exit Stradegy-A Plan For Defeat

 

 Who in the $#&%& coined the phrase 'Exit Stradegy'?  I bet they were not in the military, or from Texas. It makes me physically ill to realize they are from America. They certainly not "American', though. They need to be deported, but who would even let them live in the country next to their's. Did FDR or Eisenhower have an exit stradegy in WW2? I guarandamntee you Patton or Churchill could not even say "Exit Stradegy". It hurts me to type it. Why would someone go to war in another country ,if they thought they might lose? An exit stradegy is something you think up when you are getting your but kicked, unless you are Bill Clinton. Are we not still in Germany, Japan, and Korea? The only exit stradegies America ever had were in Vietnam and Somalia.
  A good exit stradegy for the SECOND BATTLE OF IRAQ ( the first being against Saddam and his henchmen) is going to be through Tehran, because that is who we are fighting now. Their are radicals from other countries sending money and men, but Iran is running this battle.Juyst as in Somalia and Viet Nam, We could  kick buttl, if not for Demochickens. I think we have been a little timid in Iraq, but, I am more certain we do not know what is really happening there. Only the military knows for sure, and they do not seem to think it is important for us to know, and I believe they would be the best judge of that. If you want ot know what is really going on in Iraq, join the army, or get a press pass,and carry your a$$.
  I do know the conflict in Iraq is not a war, it is a battle. The war is world wide. I think I remember part of the fighting going on in America. If we quit fighting in Iraq, I doubt the Nazlamists will leave us alone. Who is stupid enough to just let them have all the oil in Iraq(recently discovered to be twice as much as previously estimated)? Even if Exxon/ Mobile orchestrated the whole battle to gain control of all that oil, would that not be better than Hussiene (I'm probably not talking about Obama) or the other Nazlamists having it? How long would it be before insurgencies popped up in Kuwait,UAR, Saudi Arabia, AND Pakistan and India? Probably a few days. Do you like high gasoline prices? Wait until the Nazlamists control most of the world's oil production. Wait until they get those nukes to America. Can we stop them from getting their insanely idiotic mitts on nukes if we "Bring the troops home"? I still can't get over that woman on Laura Ingraham talking about that peace rally saying " We want our troops SAFE". Did anyone volunteer for the military to be safe? I bet they want their country to be safe, but being in the military is not usually associated with being safe. This is sickening. I gotta go throw up. Here lib,lib,lib,lib.


 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Solid Self Esteem

  It seems, these days, it takes less and less criticism to offend many segments of society. A person can hardly say anything, in public, without getting in trouble with someone. Famous people cannot even speak frankly in private, due to tabloid type reporters, who are almost omnipresent. A person with true self esteem is not easily offended. President Bush described himself as thick skinned. More and more, people complain  someone"disrespected' them, often in defense of an aggressive act, even violence. If someone respects themselves, they do not worry whether someone else respects the, unless it affects how much money they make, but it seems people in that kind of businesses make plenty of money , in my opinion, anyway. People easily offended usually have something they are not proud of in their past. They are not comfortable with their life, so far, so they depend on praise from others to feel good.
  True self esteem comes from creditable achievement. Someone who has always done the next right thing, or has started doing so and made amends for past misdeeds, will be rather hard to offend. This is evidenced by Christians today. It seems they are consistently being treated worse than other religious segments of society, without reacting negatively, while other people react violently for the slightest slight. That indicates something obvious to me about these other beliefs. If they are so easily offended, it seems they have doubts about their beliefs. Yet, society walks on eggshell to keep from offending them. That is enabling, when they need to be challenged so they can see the flaws they are building their lives on. If people are held accountable for their mistakes (respectfully,of course) they will eventually, at least attempt to, correct them. However, it seems society is gravitating towards building self esteem by criticizing others or lowering standards. This conduct is sickening. I gotta go throw up.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Stop Enabling Minorities

"if a person is easily offended, they either need therapy, or a criminal investigation."
   The ridiculous ease in which minorities are offended these days makes it impossible to hold them accountable enough to get them to keep up with the fast-paced advances of today's society. So, unfortunately, many members of minorities become antisocial, and are a burden on the rest of society. Chief among the reasons for this is the penchant for government agencies to give assistance to minorities to the point they do not have to work to be able to eat and have a decent place to live. Minorities do not even have to be citizens, if they can stay here long enough to have a (taxpayer paid for) baby. Undoubtedly, millions of people, who are working, still get government assistance. Add to all this the bad reputation well to do people have among the ignorant, and the poor have much with which to rationalize not putting forth the effort  required to get out of the 'getto'. Instead of publicizing the many who have done what it takes to legally go from a poor background to a very comfortable life, which is available to anyone not handicapped, the downstream media frequently reports to the ignorant how it is impossible for a minority type to make something of themselves, and how little the government gives them (out of the money taken from people who do work). Often the unemployed dropped out of school and, naturally, are not qualified for the kind of work that pays the money they have come to believe they deserve (from listening to liberals lie to them to get them to vote liberally). 
    A person who has done their best in life, and always does the right thing as best they can, is not easy to offend. A perfect example is George Bush. People are calling him all kinds of hurtful names, yet he does not even acknowlege them. He knowws he is doing the right thing,in his opinion, so he is comfortable with who he is, no matter what others say. When it gets down to it, only GOD's and our own opinion of ourselves will have any effect on us in the long run. Besides that, actions are what the people, who are worth impressing, will base their opinions on. In conclusion, if a person is easily offended, they either need therapy, or a criminal investigation.
  Many people who are handicapped have done well in America by working hard and being a likeable person. Someone who easily makes friends can succeed with much less effort than someone who is hard to get along with. However, it is not so easy to like someone who is always complaining about how others mistreat them, as they stand under a shade tree drinking a bottle of wine or a 40 ounce beer in the middle of the day, while local businesses have help wanted signs in their windows. I'm gonna be sick. Later. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pelosi Makes Blockbuster Trade

  Speakress of the House, Ninny Pullouti, made a blockbuster trade with the terroristic jihadists to jumpstart  her ascension to the throne over America. In exchange for the British hostages, she promised the US will abandon Iraq to the terrorists, as well as a country  to be named later, believed to be Israel. She also promised, both, Bush and Cheney will be impeached. This will, at least, occupy the Bush Boys enough for the terrorists to maneuver with impunity until '08, when the leftists believe they will gain control of the final branch of America's government, the presidency. Ninny is expecting  to be nominated by the dimocrats as candidate for president, in an attempt to unify the party split by Hillatolla Clintahammud and Baraka Obamahamma. As she toured the warehouses full of Iraq's WMD's in Syria, she was heard to say, "I knew there were no WMD's in Iraq, this proves it. They are all here."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Inconvenient Justice

.


 

   There just might be fewer illegal foreign invaders swarming into our country if it were not so convenient for them to live here. If illegal occupants have to walk everywhere they go, they might take a government subsidized bus ride back to their real home. Pass a law requiring drivers to display their driver's license next to their inspection sticker in the windshield of the vehicle they are driving.  State Troopers already have a scanner to read motorists' inspection stickers without even slowing down, so it would be no problem to spot illegal's, fugitives, Al Qaida members, etc. That would net a considerable amount of ticket money as well as making life inconvenient for people who do not want their whereabouts known. The income from the fines and arrests generated would fund extra officers for the participating authorities. Some people might decide not to break laws in the first place.
   Also, stop letting illegal's get drivers licenses, or permanent license plates. Last time I renewed my driver's license, I had to get a new SS card because my card was not perfectly legible. Then, to get my SS card, I had to show my last year's W2 or birth certificate. How can an illegal do any of that? Yet, the other day, a friend of mine could not get his license renewed the first day he tried because an applicant ,who could not speak a word of English occupied several employees, and it was 5 o'clock by the time the person, who did not understand a word of English, received  his license. I would think a  person would need to understand our language to drive on our roads where all the signs are written in English. No wonder so many Hispanics are arrested for DWI'S. 
   For this plan to work, one would have to make it illegal to be a member of the ACLU( yeah, right), who will never allow us to stop the illegal invasion, even by terrorists with a Mason jar of bio toxin in their pocket. How many of those WMD'S that Iraq was not making, will it take to wake up "the vast majority of Americans"  ( who haven't been heard from since WW 2)? The legal arm of the 'Attack Liberals', the ACLU, is steadily setting up illegal invaders and terrorists with more rights than the vast majority of the people living in America,taxpaying people with jobs and/or money. People say 'illegal's spend billions here', in an attempt to say it's ok for illegal's to send more billions of untaxed dollars to their REAL 'HOMES' ,pun intended. I do not think the illegal's brought much money with them when they broke into our country, so obviously, any money they spend was already here. And with the wide open borders, it's no wonder there are more, cheaper, and more powerful illegal drugs available for our children to kill themselves with these days. And, how long will it be before Americans are no longer the majority, and lose control of our government, and our country? I guess preventing this would be too much of an inconvenient justice.  I gotta go throw up, then go see a therapist.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Russia Not Sneaky Enough

  Does anyone to the 'right of liberal' think for a minute the Russians' getting the *&%^% out of Iran right before the act of war by Iran against Great Britian is a coincidence. About the same chance of a coincidence as the price of oil skyrocketing every time Exxon/Mobile gets sued for billions (see lawsuit by state of Alabama and City of New York against Ex/Mob and note the date of judgement in the Alabama case and the date of filing of the NYC suit). After Russia got Iran's nuclear weapons program far enough along and defended enough (with Russia's best antiaircraft systems) for Iran to proceed on it's own, Russian scientists and advisors suddenly split for home. I bet a paid day off against a moldy slice of cheese the Russian's knew about Iran's hostage aspirations. However, I doubt Iran knows they  are about to commit suicide, while Russia corners the oil market due to Russia's third largest oil reserves in the world, and soon to be the largest nonradioactive oil fields. You can also bet that, due to Russia's inability to access its oil, (no money, equipment, or technology) Ex/Mob is behind the whole situation, and planning to run the oil business for Russia. This is sickening. I gotta go.....well, you know.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dems Demo War Effort

  The Democrat leaders purposely included attachments, to the bill for refunding the troops (fighting for our survival as a free nation), they knew our Com. n Chief would veto. This is to put the blame on GW for not getting money to the troops, and for not financing the petty (compared tom the Battle of Iraq in the War on Terror) projects, which will make the intended recipients of the pork chops angry at GW. They  even reinforced their obvious treachery by saying they were willing to compromise on the bill, which told the terrorists how long to take a vacation in their conquest of Iraq, until the date of America's surrender. Then they would be fresh and free to take over the second largest oil reserves in the world. Also, passage of this certificate of insanity would force the Iraqi's to cooperate with the terrorists, due to the certainty of torture and death of anyone  who cooperated with America, as soon as we surrender and retreat, just as happened in Vietnam and Cambodia. The sick part of this is the Demo's know all this and either think we are too stupid to figure it out, or don't care. I gotta go throw up on a picture of Ninny Pullouti... I mean Nancy something or another.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Edwards need to stop being Lib and face reality fo once

 
Here's a scenario. Edwards gets elected.  Iran probably has the capability to make bombs right now, which they are doing. That is why the Russian scientists went home. People read my blog and word gets out that Russia is behind the terrorists, in an attempt to corner the oil market, by getting the Mideast so radioactive the oil is not accessable for a couple of centuries. Pres. Edwards needs to meet personally with whatever KGB thug is running Russia to stop the impending nuclear war between Israel and Iran and newly radicalized Pakistan, who have tied Musshareefer to a nuclear missile aimed at Israel ( probably will land in Iran, and the libs will blame former Pres. Bush and Cheney). Edwards' wife takes a turn for the worse and will die any minute. Even if he goes to the world saving summit, he will NOT be strictly focused on the upcoming nuclear war we will have to participate in and need Russia to stay out of. I need to throw up. Later.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AP ties to insurgents revealed

The Associated Press office in Bagdad is smack dab in the middle of a Shiite rocket launching area. The AP's office has not had any trouble with these insurgents, the AP describes as too much for America's military to handle. Analysts believe the AP may be providing reports of American military plans, conveniently called anonymous leaks, in our fight for life as we know it. Many of America's tactics, used in the war on terror, have been revealed to the whole world,including the enemy, by the AP and their cohorts, the downstream media. 
The UN sec.gen was visiting Bagdad, when a rocket was fired into the green zone from the vicinity of the AP office. The rocket landed close to the sec. gen., obviously intended to make the situation appear worse than it really is, which the  AP and the rest of the downstream media has been doing for years, only with lies,  exaggerations, and other effective means of propaganda                                                                                    
                                              The following was published in the Houston Chronicle:
"a rocket exploded 50 yards from the U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon during a news conference in Baghdad's Green Zone, causing him to cringe and duck just minutes after Iraq's prime minister said the visit showed the city was "on the road to stability." The Katyusha rocket was fired from a mainly Shiite area on the east bank of the Tigris River, not far from The Associated Press office. The heavily guarded Green Zone on the opposite bank is home to the U.S. Embassy, Iraq's government and the parliament. "
    The AP obviously did not cooperate with the American military by identifying their neighbors who fired the rocket., which surprised no one, according to many. A leading analyst was quoted as saying "This is just another example of the Downstream Media protecting their sources of news about the enemies of America, which is always slanted against America in an attempt to draw out the war long enough to allow Democrats a chance to tighten their noose around the  &>(($ of America. There is no way to estimate the number of American troops killed or wounded due to the DSM's campaign to liberalize America, but it is substantial, and getting worse." Then the analyst had to go throw up.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Congressional Air Pollution; Hard to Offend Christians

 I wonder if Al G. was under oath when he spewed all those lies to Congress trying to sell his carbon offsets...I mean, global warming theory. After all the foul air he emitted during his story time soliloquy, he will need to start another carbon offsets company to cover the damage to the environment  he caused. If he was under oath during his commercial for his carbon offsets company, he is looking at a lot of time in the pokie. I wonder if anyone has won a Nobel Peace Prize while they were in the penitentiary. All that money would look good on his commissary book.
   And another thing, the reason Christians do not react violently when our GOD is referred to irreverently, is GOD is REAL and does not need our help defending HIMSELF with any 'jihad'. The God, whose Son is Jesus Christ, certainly does not need any  men to fight His fights. He said He has His own back (JUSTICE IS MINE). All He wants us to do is demonstrate how He wants us to live and the benefits that accompany such a life. Consequently, our faith cannot be shaken by any words foaming out of someone's mouth. It does make me sad when someone declares they do not believe in GOD though, because ETERNITY IS A LONG, LONG, LONG TIME.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iraq: "One Day At A Time"

 I once published this, pretty much, when I was " Real American" :  Iraq is like a recovering alcoholic. Under Saddam, their big problem, Saddam, covered up their, obviously, many other problems. When GW took their alcohol (Saddam) away, their myriad other problems sprang up faster than oil related contractors. Many, it seems, were a thousand years old. These problems were not so visible, but they certainly were not dormant. Add to this, it seems the Arab way to settle any argument is with violence. And I thought the minorities in America were easily incited. These problems are many and deep seated, but not insurmountable. The recovering alcoholics(Iraqis) need our support and help, but one of the main ways to help someone in recovery is to hold them accountable and not enable them. At the same time they need to be separated from alcohol(tyranny), so we need to keep the outside forces trying to establish another tyrannical government( Iran, Al Qaeda, maybe even Russia) from getting a grip on Iraq before they are strong enough to stand on their own. Naturally, life in Iraq, initially, seemed  worse after the removal of alcohol(Saddam) than before. But, if they stay out from under the oppression of tyranny, life will improve, "one day at a time".
   In order to gain true freedom, the people of Iraq must be willing to do whatever it takes to put their past behind them and start new lives. That will require forgetting grudges, yet making amends for wrongs they did to others. Then, and only then, the Sunni's, Shiite's, and Kurds will be able to live in peace. One would think this process would be eased with the income from their gawkingly huge oil reserves. In my opinion, if the Iraqi's settle their differences, the oil revenue would make their lives better,but if they do not get along with each other, the oil will multiply their troubles exponentially. The money could be used as an incentive for them to settle their differences,though. If, receiving money from the oil is contingent upon living together peacefully, many people will see problems with someone, who does not agree with them on every little thing, in a whole new light. True, many will not be affected as much by having a chance at a better life, but the ones who are will be much more likely to help convince the ones who are not, to see things rationally. It seems as if most Iraqi's, in the areas with most of the violence,are reluctant to stand up to the troublemakers. Surely, the local Iraqi people could easily identify foreign mercenaries( hired to keep the insurgency going until the American Liberals are able to make rational Americans allow them to withdraw the American military from the Middle East, so the Radlamists can take over the whole region, including Pakistan, with their nuclear weapons). Now I definitely have to call earrrrrrrrrrlllllll.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Freedom Is Not A Gift

   Unfortunately, for Liberals, freedom is earned, through taking responsibility. The more freedom you want, the more responsibility you have to take. Many people demand freedom or its twin, control, yet they do not accept the responsibility that comes with it. This is a recipe for disaster, though the disaster may be postponed by an enabler or two. These responsibility shirking, freedom demanding people are called liberals if they are not called alcoholic/addicts. Liberals who are not actually addicted to drugs or alcohol, are usually addicted to control(power). Often, these people are teachers. The really bad ones become Democrat politicians( Hillatola Clintahammud comes to mind). This is not to say all Democrats are liberals.
   When a person rejects responsibility, they lose freedom, often unknowingly due to the defense mechanism known as denial. They refuse to acknowledge the truth, even to the point of rewriting history and/or living in a bubble mentally unaware of the outside world, yet claiming to be an authority on, not only what is going on in the world, but also how to deal with it. Then, if their advise is followed, naturally, with poor, even disastrous results, they claim to be misinformed by someone, or their advise was not followed correctly. Nothing is ever their fault. These people become enslaved by the very lies that they live, though they believe they are escaping responsibility by denying guilt. This behavior, left unchecked, eventually spirals out of control, destroying themselves and even everyone around them, because of their continuing projecting blame on others. Can you see this happening to anyone you know of? Maybe someone running for President? Sickening isn't it?
   The only way to effectively deal with a disease of the mind like this, and liberalism is a disease, is hold these people accountable for their mistakes( poor choices). Unfortunately, America's conservatives (rather than be called 'right', we should be called 'correct') have been avoiding confrontations with the liberals due to the annoying way the libs debate. When a lib's point is exposed as baseless, (as always) a lib will start talking louder, faster, and, eventually, angrily to get their challenger to stop disagreeing with them before someone realizes the lib's lack of even basic understanding, usually through sheer ignorance, of the issue in which they actually believe they are an expert. Often as not, to me, they have based their opinion on rumors and gossip instead of real research. Sometimes, due to the sickening enabling of the non- confrontational Republicans, the twisted misperceived belief of liberals can become the accepted  norm. If conservatives would get a backbone and confront the liberals about their twisted beliefs, which will get worse if not we do not hold these people accountable, it will become easier, and the appearance of being the easier way is what attracts a liberal, to correct their mistakes. Alas, today's Republican 'leaders' would rather lay down like a door mat than stand like a brick wall. Now, I know I am gonna be sick. Where's Raaaaalphhhhhh?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democrats Trophy Hunting

 
Now that the libs have mounted Libby on their trophy wall, they are going back to try to bag another Bush Boy. They are building this routine event into a big to do for the sole purpose of subpoenas aplenty. They intend to subpoena anyone in the Bush camp they can find to serve. Then, they will drag them before an extremely well prepared, as well as hostile, committee and grill them on both sides for hours trying to trick, slick, or make sick someone into perjury charges, likely in response to some question unrelated to Gonzales or any of the Fed. Pros. The Dems will also be trying to find some real dirt on anyone not a Democrat in good standing,so they can solidify their control of Congress without actually doing anything beneficial to America. All this while claiming to be patriotic. A patriot is someone who loves their country. These behaviors are indicative of someone who does not give the south end of a rat for anyone but themselves. The only reason they support their party is to give themselves more power by being in the majority. I gotta go puke.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How The #$^^$ Can We Defeat Suicide Attackers

   If a person is willing to disguise themselves as a civilian, then blow themselves up in a crowd, they are going to be extremely difficult to stop more than a small percentage of the time. Unfortunately, this is the type of enemy we are facing in the war on terror. It boggles my mind why  Dem /libs want to bring the troops, who are fighting these lovers of death in Iraq (5000 miles from my house), home, where the innocent civilians who get killed will be Americans (or illegal aliens). I do not foresee the suiciders getting a regular job in Iraq or going back to whatever country from which they were hired, by Iran or Saudi Arabia, to keep Iraq from developing a democratic government. And they will eventually get tired of killing each other for fun. Their purpose is merely to get the libs to force the Bush Boys to pull the troops out of Iraq , so they can take over the oil fields. I am sure they will find an oil company to buy the rights to the oil, which is either the second or third, behind Saudi Arabia and, maybe, Russia, in amount of reserves. With the money from Iraqi oil, (much of the oil will still make its way to America, I'm sure) the terrorists (Iran and their allies, Al Qaida, Hezbozo, HamAss,etc.) will set up training camps, WMD factories, torture chambers, and all sorts of other evility. They will also be raising young, brainwashed to hate anything not radical Muslim, suicide bombers. They will be able to provide them with their own airplanes, as well. Yea, it would be a real good idea to withdraw from Iraq, before the Islamists surrender (yea, right), or are exterminated. Yet, how the heck do we defeat them without killing every Muslim in the world? The leaders of the Islamists claim they are willing to sacrifice the whole world, if that is what it takes to kill all the infidels. 
   There is a precedent of the enemy we are facing, sort of. Actually, in WWII, the downstream media (especially the NY Times) and many leading Democrats would have been tried for treason for many of their attempts to undermine (sabotage) America's war effort. There likely would have been executions. There were, however, suicide bombers, known as kamakazii's.
   
  • 7,465 Kamikazes flew to their deaths
  • 120 US ships were sunk, with many more damaged
  • 3,048 allied sailors were killed and anther 6,025 wounded

Although there may be some question about the exact numbers, the damage done by Kamikazes is almost unbelievable. And the losses would have doubled or tripled if the invasion of the Japanese mainland had been required for surrender. All indications are that suicide tactics would have been an important part of the final Japanese defense.


   Though terrible, the Kamikaze menace was defeated. Though the method used worked, and saved countless American and Japanese civilian lives, there is no way in h#$@^*^% the liberals, in power now, would allow the military to save that many lives, using the only method possible, just to stop a world war, then or now. They will use the same strategy as they did in Vietnam: restrict our chances of victory so much, we will eventually cut and run. Then, hundreds of thousands of civilians were killed as the war dragged out,(not to mention all the Americans killed and wounded), largely because of America's reluctance to do what it would have taken to win. We ended up negotiating a treaty,which was immediately broken by the enemy, who never intended to abide by it.. (Seems like I have heard it mentioned to pull out the military and negotiate with the terrorists, Iran and Syria, again this time)  S. Vietnam and Cambodia were quickly overrun, with millions of civilians killed and/or tortured. It was sickening. Now I gotta go throw up.
   That was naaaasty. But, so was the method America successfully used to defeat Japan, with their seemingly endless supply of brainwashed suicide bombers. We bombed the $&$#%^*& out of the land the suiciders came from, until the people sending the bombers, in an attempt to take over the world, started fearing for their own lives and, possibly, people's lives they actually did care about. However, if the libs, who are taking over America now, were in control then (and the libs do say we were the bad guys when we so inhumanely saved millions of Japanese and, an estimated, 1 million American soldiers, called 'our children' by the libs,) either we would be slaves to the Japanese, or exterminated, right now. This is because the libs would not have allowed us to take the action necessary to win that war, just as they did not let us win the wars in Korea or Vietnam. Now, they are at it again. This time, as in WWII, we are fighting for our lives, and the lives of our children. I feel sick again. I gotta go,.... well, you know.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive