Appeasement is a tried and true solution for nations having problems with aggressive entities. The results are usually the same. A much ballyhooed treaty with lots of historic promises. Almost always, the aggressor gets concessions the appeaser cannot afford to part with. Even more often, the aggressor becomes more so and attacks anyway, though, because of the concessions in the earlier agreement, the aggressor is more powerful, while the appeaser, from the same treaty is weaker and less confident. What part of this makes sense for the appeaser? Is it that they get to live in peace for one more day. That may be alright for them, but what about their children, assuming they did not kill them before they were born by having an abortion. Besides, peace is really a state of mind, and how could someone be at peace with the threats coming, not just from the Islamists, but from the Quran itself. Add to that the lack of assurance from. so called, "moderate" Muslims, who are supposedly peaceful. Have Muslims ever been at peace? There must be some serious conflict coming from the Imams to keep a religion violent like the Muslims have, pretty much, always been. It almost makes me think most of the Muslims in America (as opposed to' American' Muslims) are just biding their time until there is enough of them to turn America into a Muslim state. They already have a US Senator, and now someone named Obama is possibly the next president. I am feeling real peaceful right about now. Maybe the Clintons can lie our way out of this one.
Appeasing an aggressive, especially a belligerently aggressive, group of people is like- here we go again- an alcoholic saying they will get drunk tonight and quit drinking tomorrow. Every time it is even harder to quit the next day. Throughout history, appeased belligerents end up attacking anyway, with additional strengths and, usually, the element of surprise because of the stupidity of the appeasers. People become alcoholics (self destructive) by preferring temporary and unsatisfying instant gratification over
sometimes harder to achieve, but always much more satisfying and longer lasting, delayed gratification (aka meeting needs over time). Base a belief system on instant gratification,and get ready for frustration, anger, and poor choices ( 1+1=2=1+1).
After years of pulling the last few hairs from my chroming head trying to understand the 'American' media's blatantly obvious, not bias, but support of the Islamists in their attempt to exterminate any non Muslim, it finally came to me as I commented on the simultaneous war on God being waged by the 'American' media. The media makes a large percentage of their money on sex, as well as other "sinful" portrayals. I figure that every time the truth about God is uttered anywhere in America, the media loses money. The Islamists claim to be representing God,so they are surely making some people less likely to have blind faith in God. That is money in the bank for the 'American' media.1+1=2=1+1
Often, if not always, appeasers deny reality when it does not fit their plans in life. When this is pointed out , they usually accuse someone, who wants to deal with the problem before it gets out of hand and the appeasers blame the handle uppers for letting the problem get out of hand, of doing something the appeasers consider incorrect at some point in time. This automatically renders anything the handle uppers say irrelevant.
| And the hit dog will howl. Someone who only believes what they want to, a liberal, will react angrily when confronted with the truth. This display of negative emotion leads to warped judgement and senseless comments, which are easily disproved by rational analysis. However, said negative emotion renders debate futile. Generally, the person thinking emotionally, will resort to talking louder, faster, and, eventually, violently in an attempt to prove they are right by getting the rational truth-stating person to give up debating the brick wall( actually a brick wall would have a more accurate point) that may eventually fall on the truth so they will not have to deal with the consequences of said truth. |
Of course any appeaser who reads this will deny being targeted, yet react angrily, similar to some people who read the bumper sticker on my Pontiac- REAL AMERICANS DRIVE REAL AMERICAN CARS
Ethiopia proved if the so called unbeatable terrorists are taken on without a pack of back stabbing liberal politicians to please, the Islamists can be defeated post haste and forth with. They will turn tail and run if they know whining to the media will only show their enemy where they are. Likely, the supposedly invincible Islamists (ask THE FABULOUS BAKER COMMISSION) will find someone too scared of offending someone to do whatever it takes to beat the terror out of them (again, ask THE FABULOUS BAKER COMMISSION) and have a jihad good time. Even though many, possibly millions of lives will be saved in the long run( Just ask anyone who lived in Europe in 1939-45), the 'American' media would rather sacrifice those lives than have Republicans running America.